New developments in the field of metallurgy, metal science and machine-building in the Volga region universities
ArticleName
Patterns of microstructure and mechanical property formation in medium-carbon structural steels subjected to Q&P heat treatment: Case study steel 45
DOI
10.17580/chm.2026.09.05
ArticleAuthors
E. A. Marinin, A. A. Slyudova, Fu Yifang
ArticleAuthorsData

Vyatka State University (Kirov, Russia)

E. A. Marinin, Cand. Eng., Associate Prof., Dept. of Information Technologies in Mechanical Engineering, e.marrini@gmail.com
A. A. Slyudova, Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Information Technologies in Mechanical Engineering
Fu Yifang, Master’s Student, Dept. of Information Technologies in Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the patterns of formation of the mechanical properties and structure of medium-carbon structural steels using Steel 45 as an example with various Q&P heat treatment modes. Modern methods of hardening treatment, particularly Q&P (Quenching and Partitioning), can increase the resource of widely used medium-carbon steels with limited mechanical properties. This technology opens up new opportunities in industry, solving two main tasks: reducing the weight of structures and increasing their safety and durability. The microstructure of steel after Q&P heat treatment consists of martensite, residual austenite and, in some cases, bainite. Martensite has a high dislocation density which increases the strength of the experimental steel; the residual austenite belongs to the soft phase, so plasticity induced by martensitic transformation (TRIP) is formed during deformation. The method of the experiment involves a temperature change of the finishing operation of Q&P treatment from 200 to 600 °C. Polymethylsiloxane (PMS-200) was used to maintain the temperature of the quenching medium between the beginning and the end of the martensitic transformation (230 °C). To get objective information, the study of the microstructure and mechanical properties (impact strength) were also made for normalized and improved samples. It is shown that when the temperature of the final Q&P heat treatment operation changes from 200 to 500 °C, there is a significant increase of impact strength (from 12.25 J/cm2 to 22 J/cm2) and there is a slight decrease of hardness. When the temperature of the final Q&P heat treatment operation increases to 600 °C, there is a grain growth; it decreases its impact strength (12.75 J/cm2), that is, performance characteristics deteriorate. The evolution of the microstructure was found with a change of the temperature of the finishing operation of Q&P heat treatment from 200 to 600 °C. The structural mixture of martensite and residual austenite transforms into highly dispersed perlite with visualized carbide inclusions and a small amount of residual austenite.

keywords
Laser hardening, laser peening, microstructure, austenitic steels, amorphization, corrosion resistance
References

1. Gulyaev A.P. Physical Metallurgy: Textbook for Higher Education Institutions. 6th edition, revised and expanded. Moscow: Metallurgiya, 1986. 544 p.
2. Oluyemi D. O., Oluwole O. I. Adewuyi B. O. Studies of the properties of heat treated rolled medium carbon steel. Materials Research. 2011. Vol. 14. pp. 135–141.
3. TomitaY. Development of fracture toughness of ultrahigh strength, medium carbon, low alloy steels for aerospace applications. International materials reviews. 2000. Vol. 45 (1), pp. 27–37.
4. Popelyukh A. I., Tyurin A. G., Bardin A. I. Improving the properties of 30KhGSA steel by creating a mixed martensitic-austenitic structure. Metallovedenie i termicheskaya obrabotka metallov. 2021. No. 12(798). pp. 58–63. DOI: 10.30906/mitom.2021.12.58-63
5. De Diego-Calderón I., De Knijf D., Molina-AldareguiaJ. M. Effect of Q&P parameters on microstructure development and mechanical behaviour of Q&P steels. Revista de metalurgia. 2015. Vol.51 (1). pp. 10–3989.
6. Seo E. J., Cho L., Estrin Y., De Cooman B. C. Microstructure-mechanical properties relationships for quenching and partitioning (Q&P) processed steel. Acta Materialia. 2016. Vol. 113. pp. 124–139.
7. Speer J., Matlock D. K., De Cooman B. C., Schroth J. G. Carbon partitioning into austenite after martensite transformation. Acta materialia. 2003. Vol. 51 (9), pp. 2611–2622.
8. Matlock D. K., Bräutigam V. E., Speer J. G. Application of the quenching and partitioning (Q&P) process to a medium-carbon, high-Si microalloyed bar steel. In: Materials Science Forum. 2003. Vol. 426, pp. 1089–1094.
9. Long X., Yang R., Sun D. et al. Roles of cooling rate of undercooled austenite on isothermal transformation kinetics, microstructure, and impact toughness of bainitic steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2023. Vol. 870, 144821.
10. Sherby O. D., Wadsworth J., Lesuer D. R., Syn C. K. Revisiting the structure of martensite in iron-carbon steels. Materials transactions. 2008. Vol. 49 (9). pp. 2016–2027.
11. Olson G. B., Azrin M.Transformation behavior of TRIP steels. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1978. Vol. 9 (5). pp. 713–721.
12. Santofimia M. J., Zhao L., Sietsma J. Microstructural evolution of a low-carbon steel during application of quenching and partitioning heat treatments after partial austenitization. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2009. Vol. 40 (1). pp. 46–57.
13. Liu H., Lu X., Jin X. et al. Enhanced mechanical properties of a hot stamped advanced high-strength steel treated by quenching and partitioning process. Scripta Materialia. 2011. Vol. 64 (8). pp. 749–752.
14. De Moor E., Lacroix S., Clarke A. J. et al. Effect of retained austenite stabilized via quench and partitioning on the strain hardening of martensitic steels. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2008. Vol. 39 (11). pp. 2586–2595.
15. Santofimia M. J., Zhao L., Sietsma J. Microstructural evolution of a low-carbon steel during application of quenching and partitioning heat treatments after partial austenitization. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2009. Vol. 40 (1), pp. 46–57.
16. GOST 13032-77. Polymethylsiloxane fluids. Specifications. Introduced: 1979-01-01. Moscow: IPK Izdatelstvo standartov, 1997. 18 p.
17. De Cooman B. C., Speer J. G. Microstructure-properties relationships in quench and partition (Q&P) steel, implications for automotive anti-instrusion applications. In: Proc. 3rd Inter. Conf. on Advanced Structural Steels. 2006. pp. 798-805.
18. Elwazri A. M., Wanjara P., Yue S. The effect of microstructural characteristics of pearlite on the mechanical properties of hypereutectoid steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2005. Vol. 404 (1–2). pp. 91–98.
19. Li C., Lu D., Li J. et al. Achievement of enhanced strength and toughness in ductile iron via a heterogeneous microstructure of pearlite and tempered sorbite through heat treatment. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2026. Vol. 1050. p. 182414.
20. Zhu Y., Li Y., Fan H., Feng K. Effects of tempering process on microstructure and mechanical properties of G18NiMoCr3-6. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. Vol. 493. No. 1. pp. 012141.
21. Hall E. O. Variation of hardness of metals with grain size. Nature. 1954. Vol. 173 (4411). pp. 948–949.
22. Brown H. R., Deline V. R., Green P. F. Evidence for cleavage of polymer chains by crack propagation. Nature. 1989. Vol. 341 (6239). pp. 221–222.

Language of full-text
russian
Full content

Back