| ArticleName |
Heat resistance of eutectic alloys
of the Al – Ca – Ce system doped with La, Ni, Mn, Zr and Cr |
| ArticleAuthorData |
National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Moscow, Russia E. A. Naumova, Associate Professor, Chair for Metal Forming, Candidate of Technical Sciences, e-mail: jan73@mail.ru A. O. Bobrysheva, Postgraduate Student, Chair for Metal Forming
Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia S. G. Bochvar, Leading Researcher P. Yu. Predko, Researcher |
| Abstract |
The structure and phase composition of Al – Ca – Ce alloys doped with lanthanum, nickel, manganese, zirconium and chromium were studied using computational (Thermo-Calc) and experimental (OM, SEM, XRD) methods. The choice of experimental compositions is based on the previous studies of new promising base systems for creating multiphase heat-resistant alloys. It is shown that all alloys, except for the Al – 6 Ca – 3 Ce – 3 La alloy, have a favorable structure – either hypoeutectic or hypereutectic with primary crystals of rounded morphology and small size against the background of highly dispersed multiphase eutectics. Such a structure assumes high deformation plasticity. Mutual solubility of calcium, cerium and lanthanum in the corresponding compounds Al4Ca with the formation of Al4(Ca,Ce,La), Al11Ce3 with the formation of Al11(Ce,Ca)3 and Al11La3 with the formation of Al11(La,Ce,Ca)3 is confirmed. The alloys were rolled on a reversible rolling mill with a roll diameter of 260 mm at a rolling temperature of 450 oC and a rolling speed of 0.2 m/s. The total deformation degree of all alloys was over 80%. Hot-rolled sheets were subjected to softening annealing at a temperature of 400 oC for 1 hour with air cooling. However, in the sample of the Al – 4 Ca – 4 Ce – 4 Ni alloy, multiple cracks appeared on the last pass, so it was excluded from further testing. The alloys Al – 2 Ca – 5 Ce – 0.3 Zr – 0.2 Cr and Al – 4 Ca – 4 Ce – 4 Ni – 1 Mn – 0.3 Zr are strengthened most noticeably during rolling, the hardness of which increases by more than 20 HV. Tensile tests at a temperature of 350 оC showed that all the studied alloys significantly exceed the standard piston silumin AL25 (AK12M2MgN) in strength indicators. The best combination of properties was demonstrated by the alloys Al – 4 Ca – 4 Ce – 4 Ni – 1 Mn – 0.3 Zr and Al – 6 Ca – 1.5 Ce – 2.5 La, the ultimate strength of which at a temperature of 350 oC was 96±2 and 92±2 MPa, the yield strength was 91±2 and 89±2 MPa, and the relative elongation was 21±1 and 20±2%, respectively. The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant 20-19-00746-P (23-19-45018) |
| References |
1. Hatch J. E. Aluminum: properties and physical metallurgy. Ohio: American Society for Metals, 1984. 424 p. 2. Altenpohl D. G. Aluminum: technology, applications, and environment. The Aluminum Association Inc. and TMS, 1998. 473 p. 3. Epstein S. G. Aluminum and its alloys. The Aluminum Association Inc., 1994. 26 p. 4. King F. Aluminum and its alloys. Ellis Horwood Ltd., 1987. 313 p. 5. Zolotarevsky V. S., Belov N. A. Metallurgy of cast aluminum alloys. Moscow : MISiS, 2005. 376 p. 6. Fedorov V. M. Some features of alloying aluminum alloys with transition metals under conditions of metastable crystallization. Aviatsionnaya promyshlennost. 1990. No. 12. pp. 42–45. 7. Dobatkin V. I., Elagin V. I., Fedorov V. M. Principles of alloying and compositional areas of granulated aluminum alloys. Tsvetnye Metally. 1993. No. 6. pp. 33–37. 8. Dobatkin V. I., Elagin V. I., Fedorov V. M. Granulated aluminum alloys with special physical properties. Aviatsionnaya promyshlennost. 1990. No. 7. pp. 55–57. 9. Dobatkin V. I., Elagin V. I., Fedorov V. M. Rapidly crystallized aluminum alloys. Moscow : VILS, 1995. 341 p. 10. Wu T., Plotkowski A., Shyam A., Dunand D.C. Microstructure and creep properties of cast near-eutectic Al – Ce – Ni alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2022. Vol. 833. 142551. 11. Zhanga Zh., Wangb Y., Biana X. Microstructure selection map for rapidly solidified Al-rich Al – Ce alloys. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2004. Vol. 260. pp. 557–565. 12. Hawksworth A., Rainforth W. M., Jones H. Solidification microstructure selection in the Al-rich Al – La, Al – Ce and Al – Nd systems. Journal of Crystal Growth. 1999. Vol. 197. pp. 286–296. 13. Belov N. A., Khvan A. V. The ternary Al – Ce – Cu phase diagram in the aluminum-rich corner. Acta Mater. 2007. Vol. 55. pp. 5473–5482. 14. Belov N. A., Khvan A. V., Alabin A. N. Microstructure and phase composition of Al – Ce – Cu alloys in the Al-rich corner. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2006. Vol. 519–521. pp. 395–400. 15. Belov N. A. Principles of optimising the structure of creep-resisting casting aluminium alloys using transition metals. J. Adv. Mater. 1994. Vol. 1. pp. 321–329. 16. Naumova E. A., Vasina M. A., Chernogorova O. P., Rogachev S. O., Zadorozhny M. Yu., Bobrysheva A. O. Study of the influence of cerium on the structure and properties of calcium-containing aluminum alloys. Metallurg. 2023. No. 9. pp. 49–57. 17. Naumova E. A., Vasina M. A., Finogeev A. S., Bobrysheva A. O. Study of the effect of zinc on the phase composition and the structure of Al – Ca – Ce alloys. Tsvetnye Metally. 2024. No. 6. pp. 53–61. 18. Naumova E. A., Akopyan T. K., Letyagin N. V., Vasina M. A. Investigation of the structure and properties of eutectic alloys of the Al – Ca – Ni system containing REM. Non-ferrous Metals. 2018. Vol. 2. pp. 24–29. 19. Belov N. A. Aluminium casting alloys with high content of zirconium. Materials Science Forum. Grenoble, France. 1996. Vol. 217–222. pp. 293–298. 20. Dobatkina T. V., Toropova L. S., Kamardinkin A. N. et al. Al – Sc – Zr phase diagram in the aluminum rich region. Collection: V All-Union meeting “Phase diagrams of metal systems”. Abstract of proceedings. Moscow : 1989. 123 p. 21. Elagin V. I., Zakharov V. V., Pavlenko S. G. et al. Effect of zirconium additives on the aging of Al – Sc alloys. Fizika metallov i metallovedenie. 1985. No. 60. pp. 97–100. 22. Sokolovskaya B. M., Kazakova B. F., Poddiakova B. R. Decomposition of supersaturated solid solutions in Al – Sc – Cr and Al – Sc – Zr systems. Neorganicheskie materialy. 1995. Vol. 31, No. 11. pp. 1418–1421. 23. Li Z., Zhang Z., Chen X. G. Microstructure, elevated-temperature mechanical properties and creep resistance of dispersoid-strengthened Al – Mn – Mg 3xxx alloys with varying Mg and Si contents. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017. Vol. 708. pp. 383–394. 24. Belov N. A., Naumova E. A., Doroshenko V. V., Bazlova T. A. Effect of manganese and iron on the phase composition and microstructure of aluminum-calcium alloys. Tsvetnye Metally. 2017. No. 8. pp. 66–71. 25. GOST 11069–2001. Primary aluminium. Grades. Introduced: 01.01.2003. 26. GOST R 53777–2010. Master alloys of aluminium. Specifications. Introduced: 01.07.2010. 27. Akopyan T. K, Letyagin N. V., Avxentieva N. N. High-tech alloys based on Al – Ca – La (- Mn) eutectic system for casting, metal forming and selective laser melting. Non-ferrous Metals. 2020. Vol. 1. pp. 52–59 28. Shurkin P. K, Letyagin N. V., Yakushkova A. I., Samoshina M. E., Ozherelkov D. Yu., Akopyan T. K. Remarkable thermal stability of the Al – Ca – Ni – Mn alloy manufactured by laserpowder bed fusion. Materials Letters. 2021. Vol. 285. 129074 29. Akopyan T. K., Letyagin N. V., Sviridova T. A., Korotkova N. O., Prosviryakov A. S. New Casting Alloys Based on the Al + Al4 (Ca, La) Eutectic. JOM. 2020. Vol. 72. pp. 3779–3786. 30. Akopyan T. K., Letyagin N. V., Doroshenko V. V. Al – Ca – Ni – Ce-based aluminium matrix composites hardened with L12 phase nanoparticles without quenching. Tsvetnye Metally. 2018. No. 12. pp. 56–61. |